Archive for August, 2008

Beware of a Laissez-Faire Management Style

If there’s anything that will prevent a company from optimizing its bottom line, it is a laissez-faire management style. In other words: a propensity among company managers to avoid too much interference in employee behavior.

All employees need leadership, and in addition, employees generally achieve a higher level of performance if they understand what is expected of them and their managers inspect what they expect.

Here’s a great question to ask an employee: “What sort of annual raise in pay do you generally expect to receive?” In recent years, the most common answer is 3% to 4%.

Now for the second eye-opening question: “What do you believe you would have to do to earn double or triple that amount?” All too often an employee’s answer is: “I don’t have a clue.”

When employees don’t know what is expected of them or when there are no incentives in place to reward outstanding performance, management is failing to take advantage of one of the most basic of management principles  to hold employees accountable for measurable results and reward outstanding performance.

A bonus schedule is an excellent way to keep workers’ eyes on the measurable results that they have accepted as a performance goal. In the following example, assume that this particular employee’s bonus is tied to his or her ability to achieve a 10% net margin:

Goal Annual Bonus
No Limit No Limit
12.0% to 12.9% $9,000
11.0% to 11.9% $7,000
10.0% to 10.9% $5,000
9.0% to 9.9% $3,000
8.0% to 8.8% $1,000
Below 8.0% Zero

Another beauty of the bonus schedule is its flexibility. Both the performance goal and the bonus itself can be modified in any way the manager chooses. The goal can be broken down into smaller or larger increments, as can be the bonus itself. A manager might decide to schedule the profit margin in, say, increments of .5% instead of one full percent. Or the bonus could be broken down into smaller amounts of, say, $1,000 increments instead of $2,000.

This type of bonus schedule sends a pretty clear message: achieve below 8.0% and your bonus is zero. But by the same token, the sky is the limit. The higher percentage of profit you are able to put on the bottom line, the higher the bonus you will receive.

And remember, rewards don’t necessarily have to be all cash. To some employees, especially those who possess relatively low economic values, a day off with pay can sometimes be more motivating than an opportunity to earn a $100 bill.
Managers are not doing employees any favors when they fail to establish measurable standards and hold their people accountable for achieving them.

Ask yourself this question: What are the minimum conditions of employment in my company; that is, in addition to showing up for work, what are the minimum performance standards that each of my employees must achieve to keep their job? This is the kind of guidance and direction that will fine-tune your organization and make it run like a well-oiled machine.

The best manager I ever worked for received a higher level of performance out of me than I would have ever achieved without his demanding management style. He motivated me to a higher level of accomplishment than I would have ever achieved on my own. At that particular stage of my career, I needed this kind of direction. While I resented his demands then, I tremendously value them today.

Avoid using the same management style on each employee. Some employees need a heavy hand and others need a more gentle approach. It has been written that the great Vince Lombardy never chewed out a player unless the player could take it. Lombardy used a less caustic management style on his players who possessed a more passive temperament.

Are you a proactive manager? Do you give your people the kick in the pants they need to achieve peak performance? If you aren’t measuring your employees’ performance, odds are that you are not managing them very effectively, either.

Take the following action steps to optimize the productivity of the talent on your business team:

Make sure that your employees understand specifically how their performance is measured.

On a monthly basis, sit down with each of the people on your team and discuss with them how they are performing against their goals and objectives. Effective managers must inspect what they expect.

When employees are falling short of their goals, brainstorm with them what they might do differently to achieve different results.

Tie your employees’ quarterly or annual bonus to how well they perform against measurable goals.

Turn up the heat on lazy workers or those who are achieving lackluster results. You’re doing your people no favors when you allow them to get away with performance levels below their capability.

There’s no place for a laissez-faire management style in a high performance organization.

Bill Lee is author of 30 Ways Managers Shoot Themselves in the Foot. http://www.BillLeeOnLine.com

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Poor Business Management; When Words Become Labels

Words in any language are meant to communicate meaning. Communication, in itself, is full of processes which can derail the intended communication. Words which are spoken or written by one person become distorted and filtered by the receiver. The filters the communication receiver uses are based on elements such as their upbringing, their mood and the sender’s body language.

However, when the words that the sender uses have become so overused in the vernacular that they assume the role of a label or a brand, the problems in communication multiply ten fold or more.

A brand is in the eye of the beholder. Proof of this is in the following short test. Ask a person what is in a box labelled with three letters from the alphabet, for example, “XYZ”. There is general confusion as the only answers are something related to size. Ask the same person what is in a box with three other letters, this time “IBM” and the answers are much more specific. Ninety percent of people will have a specific view.

Ask a group of people individually whether the product is good quality or good value and there will be a range of answers. The answers will depend on their interaction with IBM’s advertising and corporate presence and experience of IBM products and services. Some will rate the product highly and some lowly.

The more abstract the word, the more it is likely to become a label.

Objects are usually safe. A chair, a table, a TV, a car, all to a reasonable degree, carry an obvious meaning without too much explanation unless the people communicating are speaking of a specific type of object within a class of objects.

Events are less safe. A concert, a seminar, a party, can have distinctly different meanings. For example a child’s birthday party, a Christmas party, a retirement party.

Collections of objects are even less safe. Educators, bosses, employees can be used to describe very different people. Educators could be kindergarten teachers or university lecturers or independent training providers.

Value judgements are the least safe. Simple words like tall, small, high, cold have very different values in people’s minds. What is cold to someone brought up in Suva is not cold to someone brought up in London.

Words in general use in the community and in “business”, both in public and private enterprise can also become labels or brands with a debilitating effect on communication.

The business world is full of words which require a value judgement or are words requiring definition to have any hope of being communicated effectively. That is before considering what filters and distortions the recipient may consciously, or more likely unconsciously, use.

Best practise is an example. Unless the industry is defined, the processes defined and the variables being measured are defined, it is an abstract phrase with a general meaning of ranking some aspects of an organisation against a certain but yet undefined group of peers. Sometimes it also means the development and execution of action plans to improve the ranking of the organisation against its peers for the defined criteria for the defined processes.

Continuous improvement is another example related closely to best practise, with the difference being that action plans are developed to improve internal process performance to a level better than an organisation has done before.

A third example is “Empowerment”. Without definition of what processes people are being empowered to carry out, without reference and consideration of what authority levels are required and what competency is required, empowerment remains ill defined. At best, it is a soft and fuzzy version of what is a sensible business practice to reduce costs.

The impact of words becoming labels is that two business people can have an hour long conversation without any substance being discussed. A conversation about training needs analysis without reference to what processes people have to carry out, the competency required to carry out the processes, the means to evaluate the current competency of staff and a view of how staff may improve their competency is a discussion about words with no substance.

Further to this, a group of people could have discussion with no substance. This is most unfortunate when the group of people are charged with developing strategy.

When strategy is dominated by words used as labels rather than having the detailed substance behind them understood and shared, the strategy becomes a house of cards.

Senior executives who developed the strategy will each have a different view of what the strategy is and middle management charged with executing the strategy will have no chance of success.

When words become labels in business, strategy is replaced by individual activity as individuals try hard to put their interpretation on the nebulous direction of senior management.

Kevin Dwyer is Director of Change Factory. Change Factory helps organisations who do do not like their business outcomes to get better outcomes by changing people’s behaviour. Businesses we help have greater clarity of purpose and ability to achieve their desired business outcomes. To learn more visit http://www.changefactory.com.au or email kevin.dwyer@changefactory.com.au

To see more articles visit http://www.changefactory.com.au

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

A Definition Of Yield Management

Yield Management:

A

Tags: , , , ,
August 2008
M T W T F S S
« Jul   Sep »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Close
E-mail It